What it means: The Article seeks to have Hampton comply with recent NH legislative changes regarding parking requirements and parking alternatives which applicants may propose during the development process.
- This amendment is necessary due to recent changes in State law found under RSA 674:16-a (brought forth as HB 1400). NH Towns and Cities are legally obligated to follow these changes. Local regulations cannot require more than 1.5 residential parking spaces per unit for studio and one-bedroom units under 1,000 SF that meet the requirement for workforce housing under RSA 674:58 IV; and cannot require more than 1.5 residential parking spaces per unit for multi-family developments of 10 units or more. Towns can, however, continue to require one guest parking space per eight dwelling units, and that language remains in the ordinance. These requirements are all addressed under Zoning Ordinance Section 6.3.1.
Alternative Parking Solution for Proposed Residential Uses: If a residential development proposes to meet the on-site parking regulations with an alternate solution due to economic reasons, the Planning Board is required to consider that proposal. However, a third-party review can be requested by the Planning Board before deciding whether the parking demand is met.
This item would not apply to residential uses that existed prior to July 1, 2024, nor to residential uses that were established on or after July 1, 2024 if an alternative parking solution was not previously proposed.
The requirements are addressed under a new Zoning Ordinance Section 6.6. A definition is included in the amendment, which also follows the State law.
Those Opposed Say: Two speakers at Deliberative Session were concerned that without accommodations for appropriate parking, the beach area residents will have an even more difficult time not just parking but also getting around while others are circling to find parking. The response was that by RSA, local regulations cannot require more than 1.5 residential parking spaces per unit for multi-family developments of 10 units or more. Any objection would need to be addressed at the state level.
The changes incorporated in Article 3 are highlighted at this link: